王东风,潘莉
WANG Dongfeng,PAN Li

• 1:广东外语外贸大学

摘要(Abstract)：

长期以来，西方国家垄断着跨语际实践中的命名权和定义权，导致中国核心文化符号面临系统性表征危机。在人工智能（AI）技术深刻重塑翻译的背景下，AI语料库霸权加剧了西方的语义殖民，形成了对中国知识体系的隐性再编码。破解这一困局需构建“术语标准化-算法纠偏-政策协同”的三维机制。本文突破“归化/异化”的二元对立，在符号学和承认政治理论框架下，提出“翻译即文化主权博弈”的核心命题，旨在为中国打破“被言说”的困境、维护文化主权、构建自主知识体系提供理论依据和实践路径。研究表明，中国译者正从西方语义框架的被动接受者转变为积极的意义重构者，通过符号重构和术语博弈行使文化主权。
Western powers' long-standing monopoly over naming and defining has exposed core Chinese cultural symbols to a systemic crisis of representation in cross-lingual communication. Against the backdrop of AI-driven transformation of translation, the hegemony of AI corpora intensifies Western semantic coloniality, imposing a hidden re-encoding of China's knowledge system. To break this impasse, a three-dimensional mechanism integrating terminology standardization, algorithmic correction and policy coordination must be established. This article, moving beyond the dichotomy of domestication and foreignization, draws on semiotics and the politics of recognition to advance the core proposition that “translation is a contestation of cultural sovereignty.” It is aimed to provide theoretical foundations and practical pathways for China to break free from the predicament of being discursively framed, safeguard its cultural sovereignty, and develop an autonomous knowledge system. The study reveals that Chinese translators are shifting from passive recipients to active meaning reconstructors, thereby exercising cultural sovereignty through symbolic reconstruction and terminological contestation.

关键词(KeyWords)： 人工智能;文化主权;符号博弈;语料库霸权;术语翻译
Artificial Intelligence;cultural sovereignty;symbolic contestation;corpus hegemony;terminology translation

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 潘莉主持的广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“全人类共同价值视阈下国家政治叙事融媒体翻译传播机制优化研究”（GD23CWY06）的资助

作者(Author): 王东风,潘莉
WANG Dongfeng,PAN Li

DOI: 10.19923/j.cnki.fltr.2026.04.011

参考文献(References)：

• 胡惠林，2016，《国家文化安全学》[M]。北京：清华大学出版社。 联合国教育、科学及文化组织，2005，保护和促进文化表现形式多样性公约[OL],http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A23/jkwzz＿other/200510/t20051021＿81305.html(2026年5月23日读取)。 吴汉东，2007，文化多样性的主权、人权与私权分析[J]，《法学研究》（6）:3–17。 “中国时政话语翻译基本规范·英文”编写组，2023，《中国时政话语翻译基本规范·英文》（第一版）[M]。北京：外文出版社。 中华人民共和国国务院办公厅，2005，国务院办公厅关于加强我国非物质文化遗产保护工作的意见[OL],https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2008-03/28/content＿5937.htm(2026年5月23日读取)。 Feindt, G., B. Gissibl&J. Paulmann. 2021. Introduction:Cultural sovereignty—claims, formsand contexts beyond the modern state[A]. In G. Feindt, B. Gissibl&J. Paulmann(eds.),Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State:Space, Objects, and Media[C]. Berlin:DeGruyter Oldenbourg. 1–20. Kerfoot, H. 2019. National standardization of geographical names:What has been done so farand suggestions on how the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names couldfacilitate further progress[R]. Paper presented at the United Nations Group of Experts onGeographical Names 2019 Session, New York, USA, April–May 2019. Legge, J. 1891. The Sacred Books of China:The Texts of T??oism. Part I:The T??o Teh King, andThe Writings of Kwang-tze(Books I–XVII)[M]. Oxford:Clarendon Press. Saussure, F. de. 2011. Course in General Linguistics[M], W. Baskin(trans.). New York:ColumbiaUniversity Press. Spivak, G. 1993. The politics of translation[A]. In G. Spivak(ed.), Outside in the TeachingMachine[C]. New York:Routledge. 179–200. Taylor, C. 1994. The politics of recognition[A]. In A. Gutmann(ed.), Multiculturalism:Examiningthe Politics of Recognition[C]. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. 25–73. United Nations Chinese Delegation. 1981. Report on the standardization of geographical namesin China[A]. In Third United Nations Conference on the Standardization of GeographicalNames(Vol. II):Technical Papers[C]. New York:United Nations. 74–75. Venuti, L.(ed.). 1992. Rethinking Translation:Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology[C]. London:Routledge. Xu, Yufan. 2024. Boundaries and classification:The cultural logic of treating foreign medicine[J].Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:Article No. 79.
• 1参见http://www.cgn-mca.ac.cn/n763/n799/c30404/content.html。